|
|
Being able to be in contact with a user allows us not only to see what a participant does and says, but also to detect their non-verbal language that in a remote study could go unnoticed. In addition, it generates a more natural and empathetic context. Incident-proof laboratory : in both scenarios there is a possibility that something will go wrong. Whose prototype hasn't failed at the last minute? However, when we do research remotely there is a greater chance that an incident will occur, which may take a reasonable amount of time to resolve. Many of these problems can also occur in an in-person study. However, our laboratory is prepared precisely to avoid these types of incidents .
For example, the entire video and audio system that is captured during the studies is connected by cable, and if there were any incident such as the power going out, the connection Brazil Mobile Number List would not be lost and the connection could be continued. In addition to this, we have more alternative devices (in case the one being used fails) and direct contact with the participant. All of this makes it easier to resolve potential problems should they arise. Better study preparation: when we work with users, it is essential to thoroughly prepare the laboratory and be prepared for any circumstance.
In addition, we can anticipate possible alterations such as works in the building and adapt our study dates to avoid noise or interruptions from third parties. Which is much more complicated remotely. More variety of devices : being in our own laboratory, we have all types of equipment and devices, and it does not depend on what the user has available at home. This enriches our studies and also avoids potential technical incidents. Easier moderation: It is easier to connect with participants and keep their attention in person. Participants can ask questions at any point and feel greater responsibility (than at home) to contribute value to the study. This makes the moderator's job easier in person. |
|
發表於 2024-3-3 13:01:11